Kurt Roggen [BE]

My feedback

  1. 152 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General VMM Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Keiko Harada responded

    Hello all,

    this idea is being under review. Once we have more information, we will be updating the status.

    regards,

    VMM Product Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    An obvious feature for on-premise only use of Hyper-V Replica without the use/requirement of ASR.
    Including failover, test failover, etc...

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  2. 121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  General VMM Feedback » VMM Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    Hi Keiko,
    Thanks for your feedback. However, I'm not sure what I'm supposed to find relating to multi-select. I also have not found any extra information in the UR6 KB article relating to multi-select in the UI. I would appreiate if you could be more specific.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    1. D & C is a must. A & B is nice to have.
    2. Select a node is most cases, but in some case use best placement.
    3. LM within cluster and cross-cluster is must. Storage migration is nice to have.
    4. No, dont care since it is user specified (overrules engine placement) - C&D
    5. Allow Multi-Select VM modifications (cloud assignment, tags, access, hardware specs, ...) and actions (shutdown, integration components, ...)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    1. D & C is a must. A & B is nice to have.
    2. Select a node is most cases, but in some case use best placement.
    3. LM within cluster and cross-cluster is must. Storage migration is nice to have.
    4. No, dont care since it is user specified (overrules engine placement) - C&D
    5. Allow Multi-Select VM modifications (cloud assignment, tags, access, hardware specs, ...)

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  3. 169 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  General VMM Feedback » VMM Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Ashish Mehndi responded

    This feature is being planned, will update once we start working on this.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kurt Roggen [BE] commented  · 

    Hi Hector, I understand that the VMM team may have other and more important priorities and has limited dev cycles. However, it just seems strange that it takes that many generations for a datacenter product to provide such basic functionality and leverage DFS-R for synchronizing library servers in a controlled manner. VMM manages many great advanced scenarios, but tends to also miss out on basic scenarios.

    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 
  4. 201 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  General VMM Feedback » Network Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Kurt Roggen [BE] supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base