General VMM Feedback

Do you have an idea or suggestion based on your experience with VMM? We would love to hear it! Please take a few minutes to submit your idea in the one of the forums available on the right or vote up an idea submitted by another VMM customer. All of the feedback you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building VMM.

This forum (General Feedback) is used for any broad feedback related to VMM.
Be specific on your feedback. The more specific, the easier and quicker for us to review. Please be concise!! For more information, please see  User Voice How to FAQ .

VMM Product Team Response is on the bottom right, VMM Product Team Response.

Announcement section is created! This gets updated periodically so stay tuned! We are recruiting VMM customers for TAP. Check new items in VMM Team Announcement.

If you have technical questions or need help with VMM, please try visit our MSDN forums.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Extend hardware templates, placement, and VM provisioning to account for DDA devices like GPUs

    I propose extending the hardware template to add a DDA assignment for a GPU or NVME device. Handle the placement logic to account for these devices, and perform the PCI dismount/mount process during VM provisioning.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Potential Bug: Pushing a VMM Agent to an Infrastructure server existing certificate bindings are replaced

    When pushing a VMM 2016 UR4 agent to an infrastructure server. If the infrastructure server has an existing certificate bound to HTTPS, example RDSGateway and Network Controller. The agent installation will remove the existing certificate binding when setting up BITS.

    8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Console Bug: Some fields do not display output


    1. Tenant virtual network IP pool does not display customer VIP reservations. You have to use PowerShell to know they exists (SDNv2 fabric if that matters).

    2. One connected network type Logical Network IP pool does not display configured static routes. You have to use PowerShell to verify they exist.

    3. In Network Service, on a Microsoft network controller, on the Services tab, when viewing a Gateway virtual machine, the Name field of the devices to peer with table does not display configured name.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Blank Virtual hard disk templates on demand without requiring a library object

    When creating a VM template, if you want to add a data disk, you have to precreate the datadisk and load it into the library. If you want it Fixed, you have to take the time to precreate a Fixed VHDX and import it. Also if you want to add multiple data disks you must have unique entries in the library, they cannot be reused inside the same vm template. I propose allowing blank virtual hard disk templates of Fixed type of a specified size to be described in the template, and have scvmm create the disk on demand during…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Default VHDX name for system disk during template deployment

    When deploying a VM from a template, I rename the boot disk the template is made from to "system.<fullvmname>.vhdx" because I do not want the disk created as "<vmtemplatename>.vhdx. If there was a way to setup a rule to do this, it would be nice.

    22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Integrate DSC and LCM provisioning configuration with appropriate templates.

    Should be able to configure LCM for tenant or service provider https pull server. Optionally Should allow DSC configuration to be included as a custom resource and compiled and placed locally during configuration process.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Hyper-V Virtual Machine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Integrate Container Management in SCVMM or Kubernetes Integration Board with SCVMM

    Since Windows Server Container Support. It should be possible to create Containers and Hyper-V Containers with SCVMM. Also suggesting to integrate Kubernetes Management Board Integration into SCVMM since Kubernetes Support Windows Containers.

    35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Hyper-V Virtual Machine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Force Parent Disks to stay on specified volume if same file name already exists.

    Currently, VMM will place a Parent Disk on the specified "Parent Disk" volume set on the cluster or host.

    However, if the Parent Disk VHDX is changed in some way, but does not have its file name updated, the next time a VM is being created, it will fully copy the "new" Parent Disk to the next volume sorted alphabetically instead of appending a "-1" or "Copy 1" onto the file name.

    For example:

    TESTVM has a single hard disk that is set to differencing:

    TESTVM-HDD-01.vhdx --> TESTVM-HDD-01-diff.vhdx

    When TESTVM is created for the first time, TESTVM-HDD-01.vhdx is copied to…

    8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Include a -MaxSize option for New-SCStorageVolume that accounts for the S2D resiliency type

    When you manage an S2D storage pool in VMM, the "Storage available" value that appears in the console (from the RemainingManagedSpace property of the SPACES_StoragePool object) does not account for resiliency. For example, if the storage pool is a two-way mirror with 400 GB physical storage, the VMM console shows 385 GB available. However, the largest volume you can create on the storage pool is really only 190 GB.

    In this scenario, if you attempt to create an S2D volume using New-SCStorageVolume, and you specify a size (-SizeInBytes) that exceeds the actual storage pool capacity, you receive the following job…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. hiddensharePrevent users from creating hidden shares from the VMM console (or support them!)

    VMM Allows you to create shares that are hidden by adding a $ to the end of the name. It works fine and allows you to use them.

    However, if you remove one of these shares (ie, retire it) all of the hidden shares disappear. This is because the discovery gets run and it incorrectly assumes anything with a $ at the end is special and needs to be filtered out.

    At this point, all of your VMs on these shares go into an unsupported state and you lose the ability to manage VMs using VMM.

    Please allow VMM to…

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Allow the use of in use IP addresses from a pool in the DNS settings definition for that pool.

    Allow Addresses from a network controller managed address pool to be used in the DNS server settings of that pool. Vmm currently gives an error if domain controllers are already deployed using the pool, you will not be able to update that pool's DNS settings.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. monitor traffic bound to SCPortAcl rules

    It would be nice to create a tool that will provide a real time monitor and ability to find past details for blocked and allowed traffic when SCPortAcl Rules are used. Connectivity filtering relies on firewall traffic monitoring for troubleshooting puproses so it is essential to have.

    13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Network Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. A possible bug in SCVMM 2016 (Update Rollup 3) after building a S2D Hyper-V cluster

    After building a S2D cluster in SCVMM 2016 with UR 3 I tried to add another node to the cluster. The job failed with the error in the cluster log "An error occurred while executing the test. One or more errors occurred. ERROR CODE: 0X80131500; Native ERROR CODE:1. The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request. I tried it multiple times with the same result. But I ran a test-scvmhostcluster PS command with the new node and it succeeded. It ended up that I couldn't add the node via SCVMM but I…

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Host Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. VM and Hoststatus for Selfservice User -> Unknown

    When using VMM with SelfService Users (SSU) the SSU can only see the virtual machine status (VMS) – the user is not able to see the host status itself. I.e. when the host is “host not responding” the SSU will see Status: Running and Virtual Machine Status: Running.

    (screenshot 1)

    VMM hides the host status and keeps the last known VMS. It’s the same story for Admins and Delegated Admins with one difference – the user is able to see the host status:

    (screenshot 2)

    It’s possible that a not responding host does not lead to an outage of the…

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  VMM Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. We should be able to create/restore Checkpoints from the Viewer

    ... withtout having to use the SCVMM console, just the viewer !

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Hyper-V Virtual Machine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Enable Shared Nothing Live Migrations between Hyper-V Clusters using SOFS Clusters

    In our setup a Hyper-V cluster does have it's own SOFS cluster, we have several of those clusters. So a one-to-one relationship is established between a Hyper-V Cluster and a SOFS Cluster.
    SCVMM 2016 does not allow for VM's to be live-migrated between Hyper- V clusters while this was possible using SCVMM2012R2. This functionality disappeared magically in 2016. We really need this since we migrate VMs regularly between clusters.
    For example; we do have local clusters and stretched clusters, we need to live migrate VMs between those for distributing load and SLA levels. The loss of this functionality is documented…

    23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  VMM Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Mapping virtual NICs to SET switch Physical adapters

    As SET switches don't support LACP

    By default an algorithm is in place to affinitize a vNIC to a Physical network adapter when they are in a team (LBFO or SET). This algorithm does not always do the things you want, If I have two storage NICs created on my vSwitch I would like them affinitized both on a different physical adapter.

    Set-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB1 –ManagementOS –PhysicalNetAdapterName “SLOT 2”
    Set-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB
    2 –ManagementOS –PhysicalNetAdapterName “SLOT 3”

    7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Network Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. VHD Set support

    Add VHD Set support in VMM. Support for shared VHDX and now VHD Set has been requested for years, yet VMM ignores this critical feature.

    One of the greatest advancements of VHD Set over shared VHDX is the ability to migrate vhd set, yet VMM has no support for this.

    Please add VHD Set management (create, attach, dettach, migrate ....) to VMM.

    116 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Compliance & Remediation of Storage Hosts

    Currently the update management of Storage Hosts is partially limited in VMM. You can add these hosts as "infrastructure hosts" and VMM will handle them as standalone hosts. When using this way to install updates VMM is not cluster-aware and is not aware of S2D and others.

    This should be improved to be able to update storage hosts s2d- and cluster-aware as this is the case for hyper-v hosts.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base