General VMM Feedback

Do you have an idea or suggestion based on your experience with VMM? We would love to hear it! Please take a few minutes to submit your idea in the one of the forums available on the right or vote up an idea submitted by another VMM customer. All of the feedback you share in these forums will be monitored and reviewed by the Microsoft engineering teams responsible for building VMM.

This forum (General Feedback) is used for any broad feedback related to VMM.
Be specific on your feedback. The more specific, the easier and quicker for us to review. Please be concise!! For more information, please see  User Voice How to FAQ .

VMM Product Team Response is on the bottom right, VMM Product Team Response.

Announcement section is created! This gets updated periodically so stay tuned! We are recruiting VMM customers for TAP. Check new items in VMM Team Announcement.

If you have technical questions or need help with VMM, please try visit our MSDN forums.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Simplify ASR & WAP integration. Add ASR integration at host group level, not Cloud level to simplify DR for tenants

    The challenges today with ASR integration together with Azure Pack:

    Requires at least two management stamps (increases footprint and costs)

    Requires two Service Provider Foundation installations

    Requires two Windows Azure Pack environments (which can be comprehensive when it’s for production scenarios, especially service providers)

    Makes NVGRE complex for tenant workloads

    It’s the opposite of what's origin – which is democratization of Disaster Recovery scenarios

    DR is enabled at the Cloud level in SCVMM, which breaks the relationship between subscriptions, hosting plans for tenants in Windows Azure Pack

    Suggestion(s):

    Remove DR integration at the Cloud level in SCVMM

    Enable the DR…

    12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Host Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Cluster Deployment -> Logical Switch Deployment / Static IP address assignment

    If a Hyper-V cluster is created with VMM you can only create a Standard Switch on all Hyper-V hosts. It would be better to select a Logical Switch here.

    Another pain point is the assignment of a static IP address to the cluster. In the 2012 R2 release sometimes it works that the option will be visible sometimes not. A drop down menu where I can choose between DHCP or static assignment would be better.

    6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Host Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Improve Update Console

    Update console is too "poor" because I can't see who many servers need a specific update and if the update is obsolete or not. The console must be improved like WSUS

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Host Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Keiko Harada responded

    Due to the low voters for this idea, we have declined this idea. The votes are released to the subscribers.

2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base